Words on Army Leadership Essay - Words · Words on Army Leadership. Topics: Leadership, Motivation, Management Pages: 5 ( words) Published: July 22, In the army there are 3 main FM's that cover leadership. They are FM , FM , and FM The Army's definition of leadership is the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and · Military leadership is old, entrenched, and traditional with little flexibility in terms of normative behavior. On the other hand, virtual leadership is new, highly flexible, and sometimes signals a flat organizational hierarchy. Military leadership cannot exhibit a flat organizational hierarchy, because effective military leadership depends on the ascription to established structure and chain of command
Free Military Leadership Essays | WOW Essays
Richard F Natonski was the Lieutenant General in US Marine Corps. He military leadership essay the ground combat zone and 1st Marine Division during Operation Al Fajr in order to retake Fallujah in The first battle of Fallujah, Iraq resulted in control of city to be left with foreign Muslim extremists and resistance fighters.
In November, the US Coalition took the decision to undertake a follow-up campaign with the purpose to prevent outspread of armed opposition. Evidences from the second Battle of Fallujah are the clear indicator of the ways the commander has exercised principles of mission of command. According to Shamir Eitan, Al Fajr was the joint operation that involved Army and Air Force teams, SEAL Sniper team, and Navy Seebees.
Shamir also highlighted that Natonski mechanized a team, understood their strengths, put his faith in the subordinates, and led them from the front. He military leadership essay all what the great leaders do. The fundamental plan of operations was to clean up the area from resistant fighters and rebuild the city. The mission command principles are exercised by US army commander to exercise authority and assure discipline within team members. This term is very detrimental; it is primarily because it is the guiding principle exercised by military leadership essay successful leaders and also a component of mission command.
Leaders establish their trust in their subordinates and allow them to plan, coordinate and implement decisions in intense operational environments. Thus opportunity to take decisive actions is the outcome of this doctrine. The paper presents an insight about how effectively Natonski used the mission command principles during Operation Al Fajr and the ways it made him a successful leader.
Building of Cohesive Teams As mentioned, after the first battle of Fallujah, the city had become source of attraction of the Iraqi resistance fighters and international Muslim volunteers. The US occupational forces decided to turn the city into a trap so that they can isolate the insurgents and clear the city. According to Shamir, joint military operation was planned by the US forces and the formation of Forces Services Support Group is the perfect example of how Natonski built the cohesive teams by using principles of mutual trust.
The operational planning team was developed immediately after the declaration of elections in Baghdad. Shamir further mentioned that as Fallujah was an insurgent base and undertaking successful elections was not possible where enemy can rest, train, rearm, and launch the attacks, military leadership essay.
Natonski mobilized Marine Expedition Unit in the west while assault to be undertaken in Fallujah. The Military force battalion surrounded the city, protected rear area and blocked the forces. The Black Watch battalion limited insurgent movement towards and from the southern regions and Brigade Combat Teams launched the attack. The task assignments, creation of disciplinary course of action and the opportunity to look at the situation and react are the opportunities provided by the leader to entire team of diverse people.
Successful leaders trust their team members and appreciate their efforts. Instead of taking all credit of efforts, the leaders appreciate their team members for achieving the desired outcomes.
That is what Natonski did during second battle of Fallujah. They not only followed the plan but with the essence of mutual understanding and decision overcome the obstacles, military leadership essay, took control of the South of Phase Line. Creation of shared vision and understanding Building of cohesive teams is not possible unless the leader has created shared vision and understanding.
All team members are aware about the operation, it is the core responsibility of military leaders. It is the organizational dimension military leadership essay trust. In most of the cases, usually top management is aware about the ultimate outcome of the decision. However, in this case, Natonski assured that each member of the team understands the reasons and need of undertaking the operation.
Use of spirit de corps essence ties organizational members together. Before the operation, initial training was provided to the Iraqi force in order to establish trust. They play hands-on role into the battle and worked side by side with the US military forces but their contributions were not highlighted in the battle of Fallujah. A true leader appreciates the efforts of each individual responsible for the successful execution of the mission and in one of the interviews, Natonski mentioned their performance.
Although in the media, when battle was over, Marine soldiers and joint military forces were held responsible for victory but Natonski mentioned the performance of Iraqi battalion commander and appreciated him for his performance.
This is what the great leaders do. The principle of command considered to deal with human exploitations of the team members.
In order to achieve the desired outcomes, effective relations were built with general public and with the other locals. As a result, reliable source of information was accessed to shape and reshape the strategies.
The leaders have clear intent of what they are going to do and exactly how they are going to do it. There are several reliable sources that communicate the essence of effective leadership of Natonski during the second battle of Fallujah.
He assured his presence during entire operation and supported the team members in best possible way. He talked to the commanders, troops and battalion commanders regarding their feelings, understandings, and their perspectives about the situation to assure whether they are on same page or not.
Thus, the essence of true leadership is depicted in his strategies and operations. Military leaders assure successful planning and device strategies in case the situation turns out differently. The commander collaborated effectively with the teams and his down-to-earth approach after victory, appreciation of each unit responsible for the success, and his sense of vision military leadership essay the indicators of his successful role as a leader.
Exercising disciplined initiative Although the media spread rumors about the operation undertaking at Fallujah, military leadership essay, but the teams were mobilized in an effective way under the military leadership essay of Natonski. It means in one of the blocks, military forces are deployed for full combat operations. In the next military leadership essay, patrolling and in the third block, the teams are undertaking humanitarian operations.
According to the sources, this is what actually happened at Fallujah under the leadership of Natonski. Military leadership essay mentioned, the fundamental goal of the operation was to clarify the city from insurgents and negative forces threatening the peace of the region, military leadership essay.
The entire operation was undertaken in a disciplined way and this is because of essence of the first three elements discussed. Due to creating united sense of vision, trusting the instinct of the team members and provision of clear commander intent, Natonski assured that all the activities are undertaken in disciplined way. In southern part of the city, teams were fighting whereas in the central regions, Seebees patrolled and cleared the rubble.
Whereas in the northern part, teams were mobilized military leadership essay do essential tasks for the return of citizens. The stipend was equally distributed to the settlers by the military task forces and thus entire activities were undertaken in systemized, collaborative, and disciplined manner. Accepted prudent risk Accepting the prudent risk is related with the US Mission of Command principle in which the leader is supposed to make rational estimates, conduct risk assessment, and implement the solutions to mitigate those risks.
As Natonski was responsible for Al Anbar province, that is also the provincial capital. Therefore, the deliberate planning about risk calculations were already started in September The leader accepted the risk and brought couple of battalions for the sake of regimental command element.
Bringing Marine Expeditionary Unit was another risk because such joint collaborations were not done in the past. It military leadership essay Battle of Fallujah unique, military leadership essay. Something that is not happened in the past makes it a risk and the leaders were successful in mitigating those risks, military leadership essay.
Discussion Battles can be won individually. They are won with the help of joint operations, mutual military leadership essay and sense of unity within team members. The military leadership essay battle of Fallujah is the clear indicator of the lessons learnt from the past, combination and cooperation of the different skilled forces, military leadership essay the essence of true leadership.
There are significant names within the history of Operation Al-Fajr that contributed their effective strategies and participation for the massive destruction of insurgents and clearing the city from the brutal forces.
However, the name which is not evidently comes up in the researches is RF Natonski. This provides a question that whether he was a successful leader or not. Success is measured with the degree of benefit provided by the leader to the participants. It is the degree of empathy and consideration, military leadership essay. Being responsible for the Al Anbar Province, that is also the provincial capital, Natonski identified the need for collaborative operations.
He set up the team that was diverse in nature and practically implemented something that has never done in the past. Later on, military leadership essay, after achieving the milestones, he dignified all the units and appreciated them for their efforts. Instead of taking credit, he military leadership essay all credit to the team members and highlighted their performance.
Conclusions The paper presented an insight about the leadership of RF Natonski in the second battle of Fallujah, military leadership essay. The leader is identified to practically depict the mission of command principles within entire battle and even after that. The leader developed teams with the essence of trust.
The teams were diverse in nature as they belong to different US Military departments and Iraqi forces. It was identified that Natonski provided required training to the Iraqi forces so that they can join their hands with the US team members. As a result a sense of trust was established and the leader provided them an opportunity to use their skills and instincts during situational demands. RF Natonski further demonstrated the mission of command principles by the way he exercised disciplined initiative during the battle.
His prominent role in team formation and development of the independent teams for independent areas within the province, simultaneous use of different operations for different regions, and collaborations with the other teams made him a successful leader.
After the execution of operation, the leader appreciated the efforts of each of the members and declared them as a reason behind success. This is what all the great leaders do. Bibliography Catagnus Jr, military leadership essay, Earl J. Edison, Military leadership essay D. Keeling, and David A. Infantry Squad Tactics: Some of the Lessons Learned During MOUT in the Battle for Fallujah. Marine Corps Scout Sniper Platoon Quantico VA, Hollis, Patrecia S. Shamir, Eitan.
West, Bing. No true glory: A frontline account of the battle for Fallujah. Bantam, Leave this field empty, military leadership essay.
Below you have a great opportunity to hire a professional term paper writer for getting custom writing help now:.
TOP 5 EPIC MILITARY SPEECHES - \
, time: 30:21Military Leadership Essay Sample | blogger.com
· Let experts help write your Military Leadership paper now! Building of Cohesive Teams. As mentioned, after the first battle of Fallujah, the city had become source of attraction Creation of shared vision and understanding. Building of cohesive teams is not possible unless the leader has · Military leadership is old, entrenched, and traditional with little flexibility in terms of normative behavior. On the other hand, virtual leadership is new, highly flexible, and sometimes signals a flat organizational hierarchy. Military leadership cannot exhibit a flat organizational hierarchy, because effective military leadership depends on the ascription to established structure and chain of command · Essay about Military Leadership Analysis Effective and efficient leadership and management lead to effective and efficient operations, conversely ineffective or “toxic” leadership and management will lead to degraded unit effectiveness and efficiency
No comments:
Post a Comment